MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029633214 · doi:10.1115/pvp2010-25161

Measurement of the Strain Distribution in Notch Tip Hydrides With High Energy X-Ray Diffraction and the Impact on Overload Modeling

2010· article· en· W2029633214 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Kerr, Stephanie Tracy, Mark R. Daymond, R.A. Holt, Jonathan Almer

Bibliographic record

VenueASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 6, Parts A and B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityKinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceHydrideDiffractionInclusion (mineral)Strain (injury)Finite element methodX-ray crystallographyFracture (geology)Composite materialMetallurgyCrystallographyStructural engineeringMineralogyChemistryEngineeringPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of notch-tip hydrides in CANDU® Zr-2.5Nb pressure tubes can significantly reduce their resistance to fracture, particularly during overload conditions. This paper outlines recent high energy X-ray diffraction measurements of notch tip strain fields in Zr-2.5Nb specimens, during both hydride growth and overload. The use of this data to validate continuum Finite Element (FE) and possible inclusion in ‘Process Zone’ models of hydride fracture are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 6, Parts A and BSame topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207