MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029664593 · doi:10.1080/13691058.2014.945774

Sexual and reproductive health rights and justice – tracking the relationship

2014· editorial· en· W2029664593 on OpenAlex
Maya Unnithan, Stacy Leigh Pigg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture Health & Sexuality · 2014
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of SussexWellcome Trust
KeywordsReproductive healthReproductive justiceHuman rightsReproductive rightsEthnographyGender studiesEconomic JusticeSociologyGlobal healthSexual and reproductive health and rightsPolitical scienceAnthropologyLawDemographyBiologyAbortionHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgementsThe majority of the contributions to this symposium issue were initially presented at a conference entitled Global Flows, Human Rights, Sexual and Reproductive Health: Ethnographies of Institutional Change in the South, organised by the first author at the University of Sussex, UK, in July 2011 (supported by an ESRC grant Res-062-23-1609 and a small grant from the Wellcome Trust). A subsequent panel discussion on Global Flows, Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: Ethnographies of Crossing and 'Translation' in the Global South was organised by both the authors at the American Anthropological Association meeting in San Francisco in November 2012. We thank Lynn Morgan for sharing her notes as discussant for the panel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it