MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029704074 · doi:10.1149/05332.0001ecst

Radiation Effects on the Performance of Proton Exchange Membranes in Electrochemical Cells

2013· article· en· W2029704074 on OpenAlexaff
Hongqiang Li, Kannan Krishnaswamy, S. Suppiah, Natalie Philippi, Dionne Reeves-Tate, Aruna Ratnayake

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMembraneNafionTritiumElectrochemistryChemistryElectrolysisProton exchange membrane fuel cellProtonRadiochemistryNuclear chemistryHydrogenElectrodeOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton exchange membranes (PEMs) are being studied for tritium separation applications involving electrochemical processes. The effects of γ- and β-radiation on Nafion 112 membrane are discussed in this paper. The fluoride and sulfate release from Nafion 112 membrane increases with increase in γ-dose. Oxygen promotes the total organic carbon (TOC) release while hydrogen suppresses sulfur release. A β-radiation dose of 200 kGy from tritium causes minor damage to the membrane, comparable to the effect of γ-radiation at similar dose. The FTIR spectrum of tritium-exposed membranes is similar to that of the reference samples except for a weak peak of C=O stretch observed at 1740 cm -1 . The conductivity and electrochemical performance of the tritium-exposed and reference membrane samples are not significantly different during the fuel cell and water electrolysis tests. It is believed that β-radiation is likely to attack the carbon chain in Nafion 112 membrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207