Effects of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion on the Angina Response during Treadmill Exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) and placebo normal saline (S) infusion on treadmill-walking time to angina, ST depression, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rate pressure product (RPP), blood glucose (G), lactate (L) and free fatty acids (FFA) were studied in 14 non diabetic patients with exertional angina. For the whole group, the post-GIK walking time to angina (393 +/- 33 sec, mean +/- SEM) was greater than the values during control GIK (319 +/- 20 sec, p less than 0.02) and post-S infusion (334 +/- sec, p less than 0.05), but circulatory and ST responses were similar in post-GIK and post-S studies. 7 of the 14 patients experienced significantly greater improvement in exercise tolerance following GIK (467 +/- 39 sec) in comparison to control GIK (313 +/- 29 sec, p less than 0.001) and post-S infusion (334 +/- 32 sec, p less than 0.005) and exercised to a higher HR, SBP and RPP after GIK than after S infusion. At the onset of angina these patients had similar ST-segment depression before and after GIK but when ST segments were assessed after GIK at the same exercise duration when angina had occurred during the control and post-S studies, there was significantly less ST depression (p less than 0.01). Of the remaining 7 patients exercise tolerance following GIK deteriorated in 3, remained unchanged in 2 and increased by 12 and 48 sec in 2 patients in comparison to post-S values. Comparison of post-GUK and post-S values for G, L and FFA for the whole group showed significantly lower resting values of FFA and post-exercise values of G following GIK infusion. The differences in clinical and circulatory responses between patients who improved and those who did not improve following GIK were not related to the angiographically determined severity of coronary artery disease or to GIK-induced metabolic changes. Results suggest that some patients with angina pectoris do benefit from GIK infusion but the response in a given patient to this therapeutic modality is unpredictable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".