MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029712794 · doi:10.1159/000170632

Effects of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion on the Angina Response during Treadmill Exercise

2008· article· en· W2029712794 on OpenAlex
Udho Thadani, Miguel A. Chiong, John O. Parker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnginaMedicineHeart rateRate pressure productBlood pressureInternal medicineTreadmillInsulinCardiologyPlaceboAnesthesiaST depressionMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) and placebo normal saline (S) infusion on treadmill-walking time to angina, ST depression, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rate pressure product (RPP), blood glucose (G), lactate (L) and free fatty acids (FFA) were studied in 14 non diabetic patients with exertional angina. For the whole group, the post-GIK walking time to angina (393 +/- 33 sec, mean +/- SEM) was greater than the values during control GIK (319 +/- 20 sec, p less than 0.02) and post-S infusion (334 +/- sec, p less than 0.05), but circulatory and ST responses were similar in post-GIK and post-S studies. 7 of the 14 patients experienced significantly greater improvement in exercise tolerance following GIK (467 +/- 39 sec) in comparison to control GIK (313 +/- 29 sec, p less than 0.001) and post-S infusion (334 +/- 32 sec, p less than 0.005) and exercised to a higher HR, SBP and RPP after GIK than after S infusion. At the onset of angina these patients had similar ST-segment depression before and after GIK but when ST segments were assessed after GIK at the same exercise duration when angina had occurred during the control and post-S studies, there was significantly less ST depression (p less than 0.01). Of the remaining 7 patients exercise tolerance following GIK deteriorated in 3, remained unchanged in 2 and increased by 12 and 48 sec in 2 patients in comparison to post-S values. Comparison of post-GUK and post-S values for G, L and FFA for the whole group showed significantly lower resting values of FFA and post-exercise values of G following GIK infusion. The differences in clinical and circulatory responses between patients who improved and those who did not improve following GIK were not related to the angiographically determined severity of coronary artery disease or to GIK-induced metabolic changes. Results suggest that some patients with angina pectoris do benefit from GIK infusion but the response in a given patient to this therapeutic modality is unpredictable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it