The in vitro isolation and characterization of monosomic sublines derived from a Colcemid-treated Chinese hamster cell population
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of 18 sublines deficient for one or two chromosomes was isolated in vitro from a pseudodiploid Chinese hamster cell population treated appropriately with Colcemid to obtain maximal induction of aneuploidy. Chromosomes 10 and 11 were the most frequently involved and, to a lesser extent, chromosome 9 and the partially deleted 6. Since analysis of chromosome banding patterns did not reveal any evidence of chromosome rearrangement, it was concluded that entire chromosomes were absent, and thus the sublines are presumed to be monosomic. The monosomic state was quickly lost during serial culture, and the 15th passage after isolation, the monosomic cell type accounted for less than 50% of the cell population in over half the sublines. This was due to a shift in chromosome number back to 22, apparently by reacquistion of the absent chromosome, or to the appearance of tetraploidy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it