Gene expression profiling of primary cultures of ovarian epithelial cells identifies novel molecular classifiers of ovarian cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to elucidate the biological variance between normal ovarian surface epithelial (NOSE) and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells, and to build a molecular classifier to discover new markers distinguishing these cells, we analysed gene expression patterns of 65 primary cultures of these tissues by oligonucleotide microarray. Unsupervised clustering highlights three subgroups of tumours: low malignant potential tumours, invasive solid tumours and tumour cells derived from ascites. We selected 18 genes with expression profiles that enable the distinction of NOSE from these three groups of EOC with 92% accuracy. Validation using an independent published data set derived from tissues or primary cultures confirmed a high accuracy (87-96%). The distinctive expression pattern of a subset of genes was validated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. An ovarian-specific tissue array representing tissues from NOSE and EOC samples of various subtypes and grades was used to further assess the protein expression patterns of two differentially expressed genes (Msln and BMP-2) by immunohistochemistry. This study highlights the relevance of using primary cultures of epithelial ovarian cells as a model system for gene profiling studies and demonstrates that the statistical analysis of gene expression profiling is a useful approach for selecting novel molecular tumour markers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".