PRIFAM: a shared experience leading to the transformation of everyone involved
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the PRIFAM, an interdisciplinary family intervention program co-constructed with parents of children with a disability. The PRIFAM's theoretical foundations, clinical model of the adaptation/transformation process and tools have enabled professionals to conceptualize many years' worth of research, clinical observations, and professional and personal experience. Through its relational foundations, the partnership forged between families and professionals contributes extensively to the adaptation of families and the well-being of professionals, by acknowledging their reciprocal resources and mutual competencies. The birth of a child with a disability triggers severe stress and plunges parents and families into a grieving process, but this process also leads to learning that generates transformation of the bereavement experience. A number of evaluative studies of the PRIFAM have demonstrated the importance of the close reciprocal relationship between research and clinical practice, which enables family intervention practices to evolve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.024 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".