MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029745592 · doi:10.1002/fld.1490

Adaptive VOF with curvature‐based refinement

2007· article· en· W2029745592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume of fluid methodCurvatureAdvectionContext (archaeology)Mean curvatureComputer scienceMathematicsMechanicsGeometryPhysicsGeologyFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Adaptive refinement is implemented in the context of the volume‐of‐fluid (VOF) methodology in order to study the efficacy of resolving interfaces adaptively based on the local value of curvature. The usual uniform mesh VOF implementation is modified slightly to ensure accurate advection of fluxes between cells at different resolutions. Normals and curvatures are calculated accurately via height functions. Results of a series of tests indicate that in most instances the use of adaptive refinement (when compared to uniform refinement with a similar number of cells) leads to more accurate VOF advection. The results also clearly show that curvature‐based adaptive refinement leads to a distribution of errors along an interface that is nearly independent of curvature. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it