MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

X-Ray Diffraction Study of Stress in a Magnesium-Hydrogen System Produced by High-Energy Milling of Powders

2007· article· en· W2029762100 on OpenAlexaff
G. Roy, John Neima, Zbigniew S. Wronski, R.A. Varin

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsHydrogenics (Canada)University of WaterlooNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMagnesiumDiffractionHigh energyMetallurgyHydrogenX-rayStress (linguistics)Energy (signal processing)Engineering physicsOpticsEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is great interest in metal-hydrogen systems. When small amounts of hydrogen are absorbed by elemental metals and alloys, the engineering materials made of the systems exhibit strong changes in their physical and mechanical properties. These changes, and hydrogen embrittlement, can be considered detrimental to the structural performance of the materials. However, the changes, often studied by metallurgists and metal physicists, can present new possibilities and applications. An example is the interest in safe, solid-state hydrogen storage in metallic lattices. The effect of elasto-plastic deformation on hydrogen sorption in light metals and hydrides has been studied in an MTL project. It has been observed that high-rate impacting of pure magnesium has an effect on hydrogen storage capacity. Furthermore, analysis of the state of residual stress performed by X-ray diffraction method for the first time in such high-rate, milled materials, indicates a very complex stress distribution dependent on the time of milling. The milling in increments of 10 minutes from 0, original un-milled material, to 30 minutes, indicates extensive changes in the stress states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207