Modulation of B-Cell Proliferative Response by a Soluble Extract of<i>Nippostrongylus brasiliensis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We and others have previously shown that nematodes or nematode products can stimulate or inhibit the generation of lymphocyte responses, suggesting that nematodes exert diverse effects on the developing immune responses of their host. In this study we examined the immunomodulatory effect of a soluble extract of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis (adult worm homogenate [AWH]) on B-cell responsiveness. We found that the extract inhibited the proliferation of B cells to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation in a dose-dependent manner. This effect was specific to B cells, since the extract did not inhibit T-cell proliferation to concanavalin A or anti-CD3 stimulation. The data presented here confirm that the extract is not toxic to B cells. We present evidence that the active factor is proteinaceous in nature and that the inhibitory activity is restricted to the adult stage of Nb. The extract does not appear to interfere with early activation events since it can be added up to 48 h after LPS stimulation, and it inhibited responses to phorbol myristate acetate and ionomycin. Furthermore, the proliferation of B cells to other activators was also inhibited by AWH. This observation shows that the inhibitory activity of AWH is not restricted to LPS-mediated B-cell proliferation. We present evidence that, in the absence of accessory cells, the inhibitory effect of the extract was ablated. This observation shows that the activity of AWH is not mediated directly on B cells but is mediated via the production of negative signals from accessory cells (macrophages), which affect a downstream pathway required by all B-cell activators tested. These effects on B-cell and accessory cell function are likely to have a significant effect on the outcome of infections experienced concurrently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".