MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spatial and Temporal Requirements for huntingtin (<i>Htt</i>) in Neuronal Migration and Survival during Brain Development

2011· article· en· W2029800887 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiai Tong, Thomas J Ha, Li Liu, Andrew T. Nishimoto, Anton Reiner, Dan Goldowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of HealthChild and Family Research Institute
KeywordsHuntingtinGene knockdownNeocortexProgrammed cell deathBiologyNeuroscienceHuntington's diseaseKnockout mouseHuntingtin ProteinNeuropathologyNeuroepithelial cellNeurodegenerationCell biologyEmbryonic stem cellApoptosisGeneGeneticsPathologyMedicineDiseaseMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Huntington's disease (HD), caused by an expanded triplet repeat in the huntingtin (Htt) gene, results in extensive neuropathology, but study of the Htt gene in CNS development through gene knockout is problematic as the knockout leads to embryonic lethality in mice. Here, we report that the knockdown of Htt expression in neuroepithelial cells of neocortex results in disturbed cell migration, reduced proliferation, and increased cell death that is relatively specific to early neural development. In the cerebellum, however, Htt knockdown results in cell death but not perturbed migration. The cell death phenotype in cortex can be partially reversed with co-knockdown of Casp9, indicating that mitochondria-mediated cell apoptotic processes are involved in the neuronal death. The timing of knockdown during early development is also an important variable. These results indicate a spatial and temporal requirement for Htt expression in neural development. Although it is uncertain whether the loss of wild-type huntingtin function contributes to pathogenesis in Huntington's disease, these results clearly contraindicate the use of nonspecific knockdown of Htt as a therapeutic measure in HD, particularly in utero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.428
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207