MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029809034 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.1295

Grandmaternal origin of an isochromosome 18p present in two maternal half-sisters

2001· article· en· W2029809034 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Boyle, Karan Sangha, F. J. Dill, Wendy P. Robinson, Siu‐Li Yong

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsochromosomeGeneticsBiologyKaryotypeChromosomeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The syndrome of tetrasomy 18p has been well documented in the literature. This is typically a result of a supernumerary isochromosome 18p, that has arisen during maternal meiosis II. This report presents clinical and molecular findings in two maternal half sisters with an isochromosome 18p. The isochromosome is inferred to have arisen during meiosis in the maternal grandmother and to have undergone mitotic and meiotic recombination in the mother of JJ and AT. The abnormal cell line may be restricted to the gonad in the mother as only normal 46,XX cells were detected by cytogenetic analysis of her blood or fibroblasts and physical examination revealed only normal findings. Thus, the isochromosome, although present at fertilization, must have been lost from the majority of embryonic precursor cells. This case raises important genetic counseling issues concerning recurrence risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical GeneticsSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207