MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029818716 · doi:10.1142/s0219199714500096

Invariant bilinear forms of algebras given by faithfully flat descent

2013· article· en· W2029818716 on OpenAlexafffund
Erhard Neher, Arturo Pianzola, Daniel Prelat, Claudia Sepp

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsMathematicsBilinear formPure mathematicsInvariant (physics)Lie algebraDescent (aeronautics)Affine transformationBilinear interpolationUniquenessSymmetric bilinear formNon-associative algebraAlgebra over a fieldLie conformal algebraMathematical analysisMathematical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existence of nondegenerate invariant bilinear forms is one of the most important tools in the study of Kac–Moody Lie algebras and extended affine Lie algebras. In practice, these forms are created, or shown to exist, either by assumption or in an ad hoc basis. The purpose of this work is to describe the nature of the space of invariant bilinear forms of certain algebras given by faithfully flat descent (which includes the affine Kac–Moody Lie algebras, as well as Azumaya algebras and multiloop algebras) within a functorial framework. This will allow us to conclude the existence, uniqueness and nature of invariant bilinear forms for many important classes of algebras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Contemporary MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207