MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029847527 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810506

Optimal Design and Optimal Operation of Separate Heat Pump Distillation

2003· article· en· W2029847527 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ping Zhu, Xiao Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistillationGas compressorOptimal designRelative volatilityProcess engineeringHeat pumpRange (aeronautics)Energy balanceOperating costVolumetric flow rateVolatility (finance)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Environmental scienceEngineeringMathematicsHeat exchangerThermodynamicsChemistryWaste managementMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For a distillation system, in which relative volatility is large in low composition range and small in high composition range, using separate heat pump distillation (SHPD) can markedly save energy. In this paper, vapour flow rate to compressor is proposed as a parameter for system optimization, from the viewpoint of system energy balance. This parameter can be used for both optimal design and optimal operation of SHPD. Mathematical models for optimal design and optimal operation are formulated to minimize total annual cost and annual operating cost respectively. Optimal design of SHPD is performed and evaluated through process simulation, for a typical case study for the distillation of ethanol‐water system. The results show that SHPD has notable energy saving and economic benefit when compared with conventional distillation. Optimal operation of SHPD is also evaluated for changes in feed composition which is an operating variable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207