An Evaluation on Construction Land Intensive Use in Chengdu City
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facing the national conditions that there is a huge number of the population many people but it has very limited land resources. Also the cultivated land resource is shortage. In the process of urbanization, how to improve the land use efficiency? How to intensive utilization of urban land? Discuss these problems for reasonable use limited land resources have important practical significance. What is a city intensive utilization of land? And how to evaluate the urban land use intensive degree? This paper adopts DE Phil method and analytic hierarchy process (ahp), from the present situation of Chengdu city land using, carrying on the intensive use appraisal to Chengdu 05-09 year construction land, including qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. Draw Chengdu urban land intensive use level in general is increasing trend, Including 2006 intensive degree is maximum, 05 year, 07-09 year are in relatively intensive use phase. Accordingly forward the countermeasures and proposals to increase the level of land intensive use Chengdu city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it