MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029893770 · doi:10.1353/swh.2013.0096

Tracking the Texas Rangers: The Nineteenth Century ed. by Bruce A. Glasrud and Harold J. Weiss Jr. (review)

2013· article· en· W2029893770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthwestern historical quarterly · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegendHistoriographyHistoryAgency (philosophy)Tracking (education)Index (typography)ClassicsSociologyArt historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Tracking the Texas Rangers: The Nineteenth Century ed. by Bruce A. Glasrud and Harold J. Weiss Jr. Richard Duncan Tracking the Texas Rangers: The Nineteenth Century. Edited by Bruce A. Glasrud and Harold J. Weiss Jr. (Denton: University of North Texas Press, 2012. Pp. 370. Illustrations, map, notes, bibliography, index. ISBN 9781574414790, $29.95.) Editors Bruce A. Glasrud and Harold J. Weiss Jr. have compiled a selection of articles relating the early history of the Texas Rangers and the origins of Texas Ranger legend. The editors identify two types of historiography—the traditional view that the Rangers were always the good guys protecting settlers form Indian raiders and Mexican bandits, and the revisionist [End Page 219] view that Rangers were the primary tool of Anglo expansion into land formerly occupied by Indians and Mexicans. The editors succeed in presenting a third, more balanced approach to the Ranger legend, including both positive and negative examples of Ranger activities from 1823 to 1900. Many of the articles also provide examples of the difficulty in separating facts from fiction in the construction of the Ranger legend. Co-editor Harold J. Weiss Jr. leads off with an overview of Texas Ranger history, breaking it down into three eras: 1823-1874, the formative years of defense against Indian and Mexican raiders; 1874-1935, the years of transition into a law enforcement agency; and 1935-present, the years of the Rangers' reorganization into the Department of Public Safety and transformation into modern crime investigators. The rest of the book focuses on nineteenth-century Ranger activities and highlights specific topics to show how the Ranger legend developed. The next article explains how good leadership from the beginning set the course for creating the Ranger legend. Three more articles provide early examples of the Rangers' frontier Indian defense. Several articles are critical of the Rangers, describing how they earned the Mexican term "los diablos Tejanos" (the Texas devils) during the U.S.-Mexico War, and give other examples of activities that contributed to their negative reputation among border Mexicans. However, one article is an accounting of significant contributions by Hispanic Rangers, diluting some of the negative impression that Rangers had a special animus toward Mexicans. Another critical article describes how one Ranger used his service in the recapture of Indian captive Cynthia Ann Parker as a steppingstone to his own political advancement. The next grouping of chapters is a discussion of the Ranger transformation into a law enforcement agency. Rangers are compared to the Canadian Mounties as protectors of the cattle barons. Other articles provide additional examples of Ranger crime-fighting prowess in the late nineteenth century, including the cases of outlaws Sam Bass, Jesse Evans, and John Wesley Hardin. The last chapter is an example of Rangers acting as peacekeepers during labor unrest in the Texas coal-mining town of Thurber. Tracking the Texas Rangers is a valuable resource for Ranger enthusiasts and scholars for several reasons. The articles provide a good overview of nineteenth-century Ranger development from their earliest mission of frontier Indian defense, through legend building as a hard-fighting counter-guerrilla force during and after the U.S.-Mexico War, to their transformation into a law enforcement agency in the last quarter of the century. All of the articles were previously independently published, making this book a convenient collection of these articles in one place, and presented in a way that presents a logical evolution of the Ranger experience. Finally, Tracking the Texas Rangers is a treasure map leading to additional sources [End Page 220] for nineteenth-century Ranger history. All article authors provide excellent notes and sources for further study of early Texas Ranger history. In addition, the editors include a good selected bibliography of secondary sources that provides a range of detailed accounts of early Ranger activities and biographies. Richard Duncan Texas State University-San Marcos Copyright © 2013 The Texas State Historical Association

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthwestern historical quarterlySame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207