MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029915296 · doi:10.1002/clc.4960141703

Contrast echocardiography enhances tricuspid but not mitral reguargitation

2009· article· en· W2029915296 on OpenAlex
Benjamin F. Byrd, Brian O’Kelly, Nelson B. Schiller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cardiology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)CardiologyVentricleTricuspid valveInternal medicineTricuspid Valve InsufficiencyDoppler echocardiographyMitral regurgitationMitral valveDoppler effectBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tricuspid regurgitation refers to a systolic leak of blood between the right ventricle and right atrium, across the tricuspid valve. Doppler echocardiographic examination of large numbers of normal individuals has shown that trivial tricuspid regurgitation is extremely common. Measurement of the peak velocity of the regurgitant frequency spectrum on Doppler echocardiography is of considerable clinical importance since it may be used to calculate peak right ventricular and, consequently, peak pulmonary systolic pressure. Doppler recording of the frequency spectrum of a tricuspid regurgitation jet optimally shows a smooth, parabolic, sharply demarcated envelope. In many individuals with trivial tricuspid regurgitation, however, this frequency spectrum is incomplete and its envelope is poorly demarcated. Such inadequate signals do not allow measurement of the spectrum's peak velocity. Like other contrast agents, air-filled microspheres composed of sonicated human serum albumin enhance reflection of Doppler ultrasound and thus have the potential to enhance incomplete tricuspid regurgitation spectra. Furthermore, since sonicated albumin microspheres can cross the pulmonary circulation intact, they have the potential to enhance mitral regurgitation spectra. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether injection of sonicated albumin microspheres enhances incomplete tricuspid and mitral regurgitation frequency spectra to a diagnostic quality. Sonicated albumin microsphere injection enhanced tricuspid regurgitation spectra to optimal quality in 11 of 15 patients (73%). Microsphere injection casused a minor degree of enhancement of the mitral regurgitant spectrum in 1 patient, but did not optimize the spectra in any of 10 patients tested. Saline contrast injection optimally enhance tricuspid regurgitation spectra in all 8 patients in whom was used. Injection of sonicated albumin microsphere caused no change in right ventricular diastolic area or ejection fraction in the 5 patients in whom these variables were measured. Sonicated albumin microspheres caused no adverse effects in this study. There were no changes in heart rate, blood pressure, or respiratory rate following injection of sonicated albumin microspheres. No patient complained of side effects during or after injection. We conclude that sonicated albumin microspheres can be used to enhance incomplete tricuspid regurgitation spectra. This enhancing effect is frequently present even at low doses and is often long-lasting. Use of this contrast agent was safe in this small group of patients, some of whom had end-stage liver disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it