MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029926001 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780416

Bitumen effects on pipeline hydraulics during oil sand hydrotransport

2000· article· en· W2029926001 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
R. Sean Sanders, Alan L. Ferre, Waldemar B. Maciejewski, Randall G. Gillies, C. A. Shook

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Research Council (Canada)Syncrude (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulicsAsphaltOil sandsPipeline transportSlurryPipeline (software)Petroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyMaterials scienceEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringComposite materialMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Oil sand hydrotransport technology has become increasingly important to Syncrude Canada Ltd. and the oil sands industry. Oil sand slurries are complex, multiphase mixtures of bitumen, coarse solids, fine solids, water and air that can exhibit time‐dependent behaviour, wherein pipeline friction losses increase drastically with time. Four separate experimental programs were conducted to study the effect of bitumen on pipeline hydraulics using 100 mm and 250 mm (I.D.) recirculating and once‐through pipeline loops. The results show that pipeline friction losses increase as a bitumen coating forms on the pipe wall. The effect is more pronounced at 50°C, but also occurs at lower temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.149
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207