MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029941954 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v4n5p49

Infinite Lie Algebras Generated by Supersymmetric Hypermatrices

2012· article· en· W2029941954 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jacob Meir Schreiber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLie conformal algebraLie algebraPure mathematicsIsomorphism (crystallography)Graded Lie algebraAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study the structure and properties of complex infinite supersymmetric hypermatrices generated by a semisimple basis, exponential sets of hypermatrices, hypermatrix Lie algebra and elements of the group of complex matrices of order two and determinant one. We study the hypermatrix Lie algebra generated by the polygons on analytic torus of genus g. By using new algebraic tools, namely cubic hypermatrices we study the algebraic structures associated with the hypermatrices of certain Lie algebras e.g. $\{sl2; f, \infty\}$; $\{sl2; \infty, \infty\}$ and $\{SL2; f, \infty\}$; $\{SL2; \infty, \infty\}$ and we construct generators of infinite periodic hypermatrix Lie algebraic structures which have classical Lie algebra decomposition; specifically a set of Lie algebras composed of hypermatrices. We study the exponential of a complex analytic Lie algebra, rotations of hypermatrices, and relations between hypermatrix groups, hypermatrix Lie Algebra, Fourier hypermatrices and the Laurent hypermatrix. Finally, as an application we will show that there is an isomorphism of the hypermatrix Lie algebra associated with a set of polygons on the torus of genus g and analytic functions associated with a countable set of solutions of a meromorphic function on the torus. In conclusion we will present a Riemann type isomorphism theorem for hypermatrices on a torus and the convoluted complex plane, generated by holomorphic functions, based on the equivalent relations of the geometry and the algebra of the torus of dimension three and genus g.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207