Sparsity constrained image reconstruction using nonlinear dictionary atoms with time-shifted OMP signal coding algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Complex signals such as images, audio and video recordings can be represented by a large over-complete dictionary without significant compromise on the representation quality. An over-complete dictionary has many more columns than the number of rows. Large over-complete dictionaries can produce sparse representation vectors and provide significant improvements in the reconstructed signal quality because it contains many patterns to select from. The use of the over-complete dictionaries and sparse coding has been successfully applied in compression, de-noising, and pattern recognition applications within the last few decades. An example of an over-complete dictionary that has seen a great deal of success in image processing applications is the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) dictionary. However, we propose a novel non-linear overcomplete dictionary that improves the quality of the signal representation while reducing the number of non-zero elements to represent the signal. The proposed non-linear dictionary has demonstrated through experimental results to be superior to the DCT dictionary by achieving higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) in the reconstructed images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".