MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2029970201 · doi:10.7202/015298ar

Un paysage entièrement moderne : Artaud dans la Sierra Tarahumara

2003· article· fr· W2029970201 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Frances M. Slaney

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un paysage entièrement moderne : Artaud dans la Sierra Tarahumara Les écrits surréalistes d'Antonin Artaud sur les Tarahumaras du nord-ouest du Mexique se conforment à certaines qualités contemporaines de l'ethnographie postmoderne : une impression que l'observation subjective est politiquement libératrice et une vision globale de l'humanité sans réelles distinctions culturelles. De récentes recherches sur le terrain dans la Sierra Tarahumara révèlent que l'ethnographie d'Artaud a été sérieusement déformée par le primitivisme romantique et par le mysticisme. Cependant, sa tendance à utiliser des métaphores du paysage pour décrire les conditions culturelles a été ( par inadvertance ) retenue par bon nombre de postmodernistes. Plus encore, malgré le fait que les postmodernes aient pour la plupart remplacé l'inconscient universel (et le mysticisme) par une union mondiale en évoquant les - droits •• de co-citoyenneté. ces deux genres d'ethnographie perpétuent le colonialisme culturel en imposant au monde des définitions euro-centriques de l'humanité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et Sociétés→Same topicCultural Identity and Heritage→French-language works237,207→