MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2029977636 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20141184

Application of Matrix Square Root and Its Inverse to Downward Wavefield Extrapolation

2014· article· en· W2029977636 on OpenAlexaff
Polina Zheglova, Felix J. Herrmann

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare rootHelmholtz equationMathematicsExtrapolationDiscretizationInverseComputationOperator (biology)Square matrixMatrix decompositionMatrix (chemical analysis)AlgorithmInverse problemInvertible matrixMathematical analysisHelmholtz free energyApplied mathematicsGeometrySymmetric matrixPhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In this paper we propose a method for computation of the square root of the Helmholtz operator and its inverse that arise in downward extrapolation methods based on one-way wave equation. Our approach involves factorization of the discretized Helmholtz operator at each depth by extracting the matrix square root after performing the spectral projector in order to eliminate the evanescent modes. The computation of the square root of the discrete Helmholtz operator and its inverse is done using polynomial recursions and can be combined with low rank matrix approximations to reduce the computational cost for large problems. The resulting square root operator is able to model the propagating modes kinematically correctly at the angles of up to 90 degrees. Preliminary results on convergence of iterations are presented in this abstract. Potential applications include seismic modeling, imaging and inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207