Médicaments psychotropes et sujets âgés une problématique commune France-Québec ? (synthèse de la littérature)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psychotropic drugs and elderly: a same problem in France and Quebec. Review of literature The use of psychotropic medication is seen as a major problem related to public health in Europe as well as in North America. The limits between therapeutic and social functions of psychotropic medication have produced many controversies. In this debate, the case of the elderly is seen as a major issue. The aim of this article is to review the literature related to psychotropic medication use among the elderly in two French speaking societies, France and Quebec. First, we will focus on social and psychosocial characteristics of the elderly users in both countries. Then we will summarize the results of studies about adverse effects, addiction and other risks related to the long term use of psychotropic drugs by older people. Finally we will provide an analysis of social and cultural determinants of psychotropic drug utilization among the elderly by emphasizing the importance of physician/patient relationship and the rationale underlying prescribing behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".