Long-term marketable yields of horticultural crops in southern Ontario in relation to seasonal climate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Ontario, Canada, marketable yields of certain annual horticultural crops increased steadily from 1940 to the mid-1980s, then dramatically decreased and became highly variable. This was not seen in field crops such as soybean and corn. Standard climatological variables showed little correlation with yields of vegetable crops such as tomatoes, cabbage, cauliflower, onions and rutabagas. The number of hot days (defined as days with maximum temperature greater than 30°C) and number of days with precipitation were better correlated with cool-season vegetable crop yield. With these climate measures we identified a period of milder growing season climate, from 1961 to 1986, and there was a greater frequency of hot days before and after this period. This analysis shows that horticultural crops are more sensitive to specific synoptic events, such as periods of hot days, than to overall growing season climate, and their yields may provide an indicator of a changing climate. Key words: Horticultural yields, historical climate, weather
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".