MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2030032594 · doi:10.1029/2005gl024186

A Tibetan Taylor Cap and a halo of stratospheric ozone over the Himalaya

2005· article· en· W2030032594 on OpenAlexaff
G. W. K. Moore, John L. Semple

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTropospherePlateau (mathematics)StratosphereAtmospheric sciencesOzoneClimatologySink (geography)Environmental scienceHaloLatitudeOzone depletionNorthern HemisphereGeologyGeographyMeteorologyAstrophysicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With an average elevation in excess of 4000 m asl, the Tibetan Plateau is one of the Earth's most prominent topographic features. The plateau plays an important role in the global climate system by acting as a heat source during the summer and a heat sink during the winter. There also exists evidence that its influence extends into the upper‐troposphere and lower‐stratosphere through the existence of a region of low total column ozone over the plateau. We report on observations of ozone concentration from the Bhutanese Himalaya that support the hypothesis that a Taylor Cap exists over the plateau. We argue that the presence of this cap results in the formation of a halo of ozone‐rich air in the upper‐troposphere around the perimeter of Tibet. The Himalaya are within this halo and the higher peaks may be exposed to ozone concentrations similar to those found in industrialized cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research Letters→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→