MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IDENTIFICACIÓN DE UNA TÉCNICA DE ELABORACIÓN DE BOTELLAS MOCHE DE ASA ESTRIBO EN EL CASTILLO DE SANTA, COSTA NORTE DE PERÚ

2013· article· es· W2030034084 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Geological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo describe una modalidad de elaboración de botellas de asa estribo identificada en El Castillo de Santa, un asentamiento de la segunda mitad del Período Intermedio Temprano (300-600 DC) ubicado en Ancash, costa norte de Perú. El análisis de la cerámica Moche III recuperada en ese sitio por el Proyecto Santa de la Universidad de Montreal permitió al autor identificar una técnica de manufactura de botellas distinta a la hasta ahora conocida para la sociedad Moche. Los resultados de este trabajo muestran la existencia de distintos métodos y cadenas operativas en la fabricación de las botellas de asa estribo, contribuyendo al reconocimiento de la diversidad regional y temporal existente al interior de las tecnologías de producción de la cerámica Moche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it