MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030047547 · doi:10.1086/339604

Formation of Vegetations during Infective Endocarditis Excludes Binding of Bacterial‐Specific Host Antibodies to<i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>

2002· article· en· W2030047547 on OpenAlexaff
John K. McCormick, Timothy J. Tripp, Gary M. Dunny, Patrick M. Schlievert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsInfective endocarditisEnterococcus faecalisEndocarditisMicrobiologyBacteriaAntibodyBiologyEnterococcusImmune systemVegetation (pathology)In vivoImmunologyStaphylococcus aureusMedicinePathologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infectious endocarditis is a microbial infection of the endothelial lining of the heart that typically occurs on damaged or prosthetic heart valves. The characteristic lesion seen with infective endocarditis, termed "the vegetation," is composed of bacteria surrounded by a platelet/fibrin layer attached to the underlying endothelium. The vegetation has long been believed to exclude or hinder host defenses from clearing bacteria, although formal demonstration of mechanisms by which this occurs are lacking. This study investigated the ability of the vegetation to exclude host antibodies specific for the bacterial surface protein aggregation substance in vivo during experimental endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. The results demonstrate that, once the vegetation encloses bacteria, they are no longer accessible to high-titer bacterial-specific host antibodies, establishing a mechanism by which the vegetation functions to protect the bacteria from the humoral immune response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207