MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030061365 · doi:10.1021/la1010924

Interaction of a Microsphere with a Solid-Supported Liquid Film

2010· article· en· W2030061365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWettingMaterials scienceSurface tensionPolystyreneCapillary actionViscosityComposite materialGlass microsphereParticle (ecology)MeniscusSilicone oilMicrosphereChemical engineeringOpticsPolymerThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interaction between particles with thin liquid films on solid surfaces was studied by sintering polystyrene microspheres of 4 to 5 microm diameter to the end of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Films of three silicone oils (viscosity 4.6, 9.2, and 9700 mPa s) and water of thickness 0.2-1.8 microm were formed on glass. The interaction between a particle and the film was measured at different particle approach/retraction velocities. The interaction is dominated by capillary and hydrodynamic forces. It depends on the surface tension and the viscosity of the liquid. The film thickness can be determined from the force curves. In addition, the meniscus formation of a film wetting a particle was demonstrated experimentally by solidifying a liquid polystyrene film as it wetted glass particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it