“A Messiah that Will Never Come”<sup>1</sup>: A New Look at Saratoga, Independence, and Revolutionary War Diplomacy*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the summer of 1777, the Continental Army under the command of General Horatio Gates fought against the British army in northern New York. Gates's counterpart, British Major General John Burgoyne, had launched an audacious plan to cut off the New England colonies from the rest of the continent by invading New York in a pincer movement—from Canada in the north and from New York City in the south. Burgoyne, however, ran into fierce resistance from Gates's men, who harassed the British army in numerous hit-and-run attacks and fought a brilliant defensive war from their encampments on the Hudson River. On October 12, the continentals surrounded the British in the hills over Saratoga, New York. Seeing the writing on the wall, Burgoyne sued for peace, and five days later he surrendered his entire army. Under the terms of the Saratoga Convention, Burgoyne agreed to sit out the rest of the war. The stunning victory electrified the continent and reinforced the American commitment to independence.2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".