MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“A Messiah that Will Never Come”<sup>1</sup>: A New Look at Saratoga, Independence, and Revolutionary War Diplomacy*

2008· article· en· W2030062727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chris Tudda

Bibliographic record

VenueDiplomatic History · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)DiplomacyVictoryGeorge (robot)LawDeclaration of independenceSpanish Civil WarBattleHistoryAncient historyPolitical scienceEconomic historyPoliticsArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the summer of 1777, the Continental Army under the command of General Horatio Gates fought against the British army in northern New York. Gates's counterpart, British Major General John Burgoyne, had launched an audacious plan to cut off the New England colonies from the rest of the continent by invading New York in a pincer movement—from Canada in the north and from New York City in the south. Burgoyne, however, ran into fierce resistance from Gates's men, who harassed the British army in numerous hit-and-run attacks and fought a brilliant defensive war from their encampments on the Hudson River. On October 12, the continentals surrounded the British in the hills over Saratoga, New York. Seeing the writing on the wall, Burgoyne sued for peace, and five days later he surrendered his entire army. Under the terms of the Saratoga Convention, Burgoyne agreed to sit out the rest of the war. The stunning victory electrified the continent and reinforced the American commitment to independence.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.686
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiplomatic HistorySame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207