MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030072420 · doi:10.1021/jp0463058

Electronic Structure of the Nucleobases

2005· article· en· W2030072420 on OpenAlexaff
J. B. MacNaughton, A. Moewes, E.Z. Kurmaev

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleobaseThymineGuanineDensity functional theoryChemistryCytosineAbsorption spectroscopyHOMO/LUMOSpectroscopyEmission spectrumMolecular orbitalSpectral lineElectronic structureX-ray absorption spectroscopyComputational chemistryAtomic physicsMolecular physicsMoleculeDNAPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a comparison between experimental and calculated soft X-ray spectra of DNA's nucleobases, adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T) using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and soft X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES). Spectra of the 1s thresholds of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen give a complete picture of the occupied and unoccupied partial density of states of the nucleobases. A combination of both Hartree-Fock and density functional theory calculations are used in the comparison to experimental results. Most experimental results agree well with our theoretical calculations for the XAS and XES of all bases. All spectral features are assigned. A comparison of the experimental highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy gaps is made to the diverse values predicted in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207