MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030072420 · doi:10.1021/jp0463058

Electronic Structure of the Nucleobases

2005· article· en· W2030072420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleobaseThymineGuanineDensity functional theoryChemistryCytosineAbsorption spectroscopyHOMO/LUMOSpectroscopyEmission spectrumMolecular orbitalSpectral lineElectronic structureX-ray absorption spectroscopyComputational chemistryAtomic physicsMolecular physicsMoleculeDNAPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a comparison between experimental and calculated soft X-ray spectra of DNA's nucleobases, adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), and thymine (T) using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and soft X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES). Spectra of the 1s thresholds of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen give a complete picture of the occupied and unoccupied partial density of states of the nucleobases. A combination of both Hartree-Fock and density functional theory calculations are used in the comparison to experimental results. Most experimental results agree well with our theoretical calculations for the XAS and XES of all bases. All spectral features are assigned. A comparison of the experimental highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy gaps is made to the diverse values predicted in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it