MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030077792 · doi:10.1177/1206331202250102

Neurasthenic Subjects and the Bourgeois Interior

2003· article· en· W2030077792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace and Culture · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurastheniaBourgeoisieSubject (documents)Construct (python library)AestheticsModernityMythologyReading (process)SociologyInformatizationUrbanismSpace (punctuation)Gender studiesHistoryPsychoanalysisLiteratureArtLawPoliticsPsychologyPhilosophyEngineeringVisual artsPolitical scienceArchitecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines neurasthenia (or “nervous exhaustion”) as a signifier for cultural practices and formations embedded in, and shaping, late 19th-century discursive and material spaces. Neurasthenia and its putative “cure”—in the production of a domestic interior protecting its inhabitants from the shocks of modernity—were linked to late 19th-century concerns and fears over the impact of economic and social transformations on the new subjects of urban life. The bourgeois interior relied on the construction of a (male) subject, privatized and turned inward; reading the domestic discourse of neurasthenia through Walter Benjamin’s analyses of the bourgeois interior, this article explores the ways in which this space served to construct its subjects at the same moment that it represented them to themselves, producing and affirming a myth of home at the very moment of its disappearance from the stage of history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it