MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030089662 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2014.2305401

Coupled Resonance Energy Transfer Over Gigahertz Frequency Range Using Ceramic Filled Cavity for Medical Implanted Sensors

2014· article· en· W2030089662 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Wang, Simon Hemour, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Power Transfer Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorElectromagnetic coilMaterials scienceWireless power transferAcousticsTransmitterOptoelectronicsHelical resonatorElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringOpticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wireless power transmission (WPT) system based on a magnetically coupled coil-based resonance is the predominating technology in most WPT applications. In the field of implantable medical devices, however, the energy transfer operation is highly limited by the size of the receiver and also the loss properties of dispersive human tissue. Since the low gigahertz range has been considered as the optimal transfer frequency, an alternative to the lossy coil resonator should be studied and developed. In this paper, an original transmitter solution is presented that considers the needs for strong magnetic dominant near-field and weak far-field radiation even at low gigahertz frequency. A half-closed partially ceramic-filled cavity resonator is described on the basis of an accurate, but analytical model. Design parameters are also studied using a full-wave simulation software package and measurement results of a resonator-to-resonator transfer scheme are presented, which show a good agreement with simulation results. An efficiency above 65% can be obtained within the distance comparable to the diameter of the resonator (60.5 mm) in this case study. Subsequently, energy transmission between the proposed cavity resonator and a small-sized copper coil of 3 mm of diameter is investigated. Measurement results show that the efficiency is above 34% within 20 mm and above 8.2% within 40 mm, which is much higher than the conventional coil-to-coil transmission scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicWireless Power Transfer SystemsFrench-language works237,207