MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030098211 · doi:10.1520/gtj11121j

Oxygen Diffusion Coefficient of Soils at High Degrees of Saturation

2000· article· en· W2030098211 on OpenAlexaff
Mengxing Lin, EK Yanful

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSaturation (graph theory)Soil waterSoil scienceDiffusionHumidityOxygenEffective diffusion coefficientDegree of saturationEnvironmental scienceChemistryMaterials scienceMineralogyThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The oxygen diffusion coefficient is an essential parameter for design of soil covers over mine waste. This study presents a method for measuring the oxygen diffusion coefficient of soils at high degrees of saturation. The method eliminates measurement errors caused by soil microbial activity, high humidity, and stagnant air in laboratory diffusion cells. Results show that microbial activity is an important factor that causes errors in O2 measurements. Sterilization of soil, utilization of a silica gel-membrane system with oxygen sensors, and minimal stirring in the cell headspace greatly reduce the variability in O2 diffusion coefficient measurements. The variations in estimated O2 diffusion coefficients for the same soil at the same degree of saturation were ±31% about the mean for clayey soil samples and ±10% about the mean for silty soil samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical Testing JournalSame topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207