Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence/ Weaving Work and Motherhood/ Who Supports the Family? Gender and Breadwinning in Dual–Earner Marriages/ Learning from Saturn: Possibilities for Corporate Governance and Employee Relations.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Diana E. Forsythe. Edited with an Introduction by David Hess. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press,2001. Weaving Work and Motherhood. Anita Ilta Garey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1999. Who Supports the Family? Gender and Breadwinning in Dual–Earner Marriages. Jean L. Potuchek. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997. Learning from Saturn: Possibilities for Corporate Governance and Employee Relations. Saul A. Rubenstein and Thomas A. Kochan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it