MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030144655 · doi:10.1190/geo2012-0200.1

Multidimensional de-aliased Cadzow reconstruction of seismic records

2012· article· en· W2030144655 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Naghizadeh, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHankel matrixInterpolation (computer graphics)AliasAlgorithmMatrix (chemical analysis)MathematicsRank (graph theory)Frequency domainHankel transformComputer scienceMathematical analysisFourier transformArtificial intelligenceCombinatoricsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We tested a strategy for beyond-alias interpolation of seismic data using Cadzow reconstruction. The strategy enables Cadzow reconstruction to be used for interpolation of regularly sampled seismic records. First, in the frequency-space (f-x) domain, we generated a Hankel matrix from the spatial samples of the low frequencies. To perform interpolation at a given frequency, the spatial samples were interlaced with zero samples and another Hankel matrix was generated from the zero-interlaced data. Next, the rank-reduced eigen-decomposition of the Hankel matrix at low frequencies was used for beyond-alias preconditioning of the Hankel matrix at a given frequency. Finally, antidiagonal averaging of the conditioned Hankel matrix produced the final interpolated data. In addition, the multidimensional extension of the proposed algorithm was explained. The proposed method provides a unifying thread between reduced-rank Cadzow reconstruction and beyond alias f-x prediction error interpolation. Synthetic and real data examples were provided to examine the performance of the proposed interpolation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207