Bibliographic record
Abstract
Passages of transition intrigue me greatly. We read and teach the great texts which mark the mountain tops of our cultural terrain, remaining ignorant of the years of gradual change which account for the arrival at a new horizon on which a striking figure appears. The passage from the late Middle Ages to high modernity is just such an intriguing journey. I am keenly aware that my few remarks on the towering figure of Immanuel Kant deserve the nuance which only an account of four centuries of "transition" could provide. I wish neither to denigrate the voice of genius which can bring about revolutions, Copernican or otherwise, nor to ignore the prophetic voice which accuses or reassures us beyond the evident. Nonetheless, I wish to raise a cautionary question concerning the challenges of violence and healing in our culture: To what extent do both our diagnoses and proposed solutions to the problem of violence themselves still originate in the discourse of violence which, harsh as it sounds, was the result of that "passage to modernity" and which crystalized in the powerful discourse of the Enlightenment?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.086 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".