MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030152740 · doi:10.1016/j.sepro.2011.08.071

A Switching Threshold Model for Oil Prices

2011· article· en· W2030152740 on OpenAlexaff
A. Palombizio Ennio, Pablo Olivares

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems Engineering Procedia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSETAREconometricsThreshold modelIdentification (biology)Linear modelValue (mathematics)Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityEconomicsMathematicsStatisticsAutoregressive integrated moving averageTime seriesVolatility (finance)STAR model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we discuss the use of linear and non-linear models to future oil prices in the NYMEX market. We go from a simple linear ARMA model to GARCH to threshold depending models such as highly non-linear SETAR and its family. We review the problem of identification, estimation and validation of the models. Finally we study the fitting of Generalized Extreme Value Distribution to the maximum of oil prices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystems Engineering ProcediaSame topicMarket Dynamics and VolatilityFrench-language works237,207