MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of chromium–sulphur interactions on decarburisation of levitated Fe–C alloy droplets by CO <sub>2</sub> –Ar gas mixtures

2015· article· en· W2030201411 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Wu, Yi Yang, Mansoor Barati, Alexander McLean

Bibliographic record

VenueIronmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromiumAlloySulfurArgonMetallurgyCarbon fibersMaterials scienceCarbon dioxideChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study provides an evaluation of the influence of chromium and sulphur on the decarburisation kinetics of Fe–Cr–C alloy droplets when exposed to argon gas mixtures containing carbon dioxide as the oxidant. For droplets containing the same amount of surface active sulphur, it was found that the decarburisation rate of iron–chromium droplets was substantially faster than that of chromium free alloys. This enhanced rate can be explained in terms of the attractive interaction between chromium and sulphur, which results in a decrease in the number of surface sites occupied by sulphur. An appropriate rate equation has been developed to characterise this behaviour. The findings from this work have beneficial implications with respect to the preferential oxidation of carbon rather than chromium when stainless steel is refined with argon–carbon dioxide gas mixtures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIronmaking & Steelmaking Processes Products and ApplicationsSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207