Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most significant prognostic factor is the presence of regional metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The radical neck dissection has been the preferred therapeutic modality to neck metastasis for one century. The objective of this study was to analyze the feasibility of selective neck dissection for SCC of the lower sites of the mouth. The charts of a series of 460 cases of SCCs of the inferior floor of the mouth treated in Hospital Heliópolis, Brazil, between 1978 and 2002, were retrospectively reviewed. The pattern of metastatic spread was analyzed in the radical neck dissection according to N stage. In the radical neck dissections, the metastatic spread index for levels IV and V were 5.8% and 4.6%, respectively, for cN0 patients and 9.9% and 5.9%, respectively, for cN+ patients. When level I was the only site of metastasis, this index was 11% and 5.5%, respectively. The indication of a selective neck dissection including levels I-IV is oncologically safe for SCCs of the inferior mouth when level I is clinically compromised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it