Rim-Rotor Rotary Ramjet Engine, Part 2: Quasi-One-Dimensional Aerothermodynamic Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rim–rotor rotary ramjet engine is a new propulsion-system design with the potential to significantly improve power density and reduce complexity over conventional gas turbines, thus making it an interesting alternative for future transportation and stationary power systems. This paper presents a quasi-one-dimensional aerothermodynamic design model, taking into account the dominant physics of the rim–rotor rotary ramjet engine: 1) shock-wave compression, 2) high-g field combustion, 3) viscous losses, 4) heat transfer, 5) inlet and outlet periodic condition, and 6) windage losses. It is shown that high flame velocity due to buoyant forces leads to a very compact combustion chamber and possibly very low nitrogen oxides. A 500 kW rim–rotor rotary-ramjet-engine version is designed with the model and could produce 7:6 kW=kg at a tangential velocity of 1000 m=s, which is more than twicetheactualgas-turbinepowerdensity.Aproof-of-conceptprototypeistestedatlowspeed(Mach1),andshows good agreement with the model for both indicated power without combustion and windage losses. Combustion efficiency is measured to over 85% at 220;000g. These results confirm the design model capabilities, at least within the range of tested Mach numbers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it