MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optical and Scintillation Properties of Eu-Doped Calcium Orthoborate

2012· article· en· W2030253848 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsRadioluminescencePhotoluminescenceExcited stateMaterials scienceDopingScintillatorEmission spectrumScintillationCrystal (programming language)Absorption (acoustics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Spectral lineAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsOpticsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single Crystals of Eu-Doped Calcium Orthoborate Have Been Grown by Micro-Pulling (μ-PD) Technique with Radio Frequency Heating System, and its Transmittance, Photoluminescence and Radiation Responses Were Investigated. In Transmittance Spectra, Eu-Doped Crystal Showed Broad Absorption Band around 200-450 nm, which Is due to the Complex of Charge Transfer (CT) Transition and 4f-4f Transition of Eu 3+ . Intense Eu 2+ 5f-4f and Eu 3+ 4f-4f Emission Peaks Were Observed when Excited to 265 nm and 385 nm, and the Calculated Decay Times Were 230 ns and 1.5 ms, Respectively. 241 Am 5.5 Mev α-Ray Excited Radioluminescence Spectra Indicated both Eu 2+ 5f-4f and Eu Superscript text 3+ 4f-4f Emission Peaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it