MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030272387 · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2004.02.049

DPVK - An Eclipse Plug-in to Detect Design Patterns in Eiffel Systems

2004· article· en· W2030272387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEiffelComputer scienceEclipseSoftware design patternProgramming languageSoftware engineeringReverse engineeringExtensibilityPlug-inEngineering design processCompatibility (geochemistry)Architectural patternSoftwareSoftware designSoftware developmentObject-oriented programmingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design patterns are not only beneficial to the forward engineering process but also help in design recovery and program understanding, typical reverse engineering activities. In this paper, we introduce DPVK, a reverse engineering tool to detect pattern instances in Eiffel systems. In order to get better detection results, we analyze many different patterns and examine Eiffel software in terms of both static structure and dynamic behaviour. DPVK is implemented as an Eclipse plug-in to ensure better compatibility and extensibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it