MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030295914 · doi:10.3749/canmin.46.2.503

CUPROMAKOVICKYITE, Cu8Pb4Ag2Bi18S36, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES OF THE PAVONITE HOMOLOGOUS SERIES

2008· article· en· W2030295914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dan Topa, W. H. Paar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustrian Science Fund
KeywordsHomologous seriesMineralSeries (stratigraphy)Homologous chromosomeGeologyGeochemistryChemistryBiologyMaterials sciencePaleontologyGeneticsCrystallographyMetallurgyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cupromakovickyite, ideally Cu 8 Pb 4 Ag 2 Bi 18 S 36 , is a new mineral species that occurs at the skarn deposit of Baiţa Bihor, Romania, and at the scheelite deposit Felbertal, Salzburg Province, Austria. The associated minerals are makovickyite, bismuthinite derivatives (aikinite–friedrichite range), hodrusite, kupcikite, padĕraite, emplectite, wittichenite and tetradymite (Baiţa Bihor), and makovickyite, bismuthinite derivatives (aikinite–krupkaite range), hodrusite, kupcikite, wittichenite and native bismuth (Felbertal). The opaque mineral is grey, has a metallic luster and is brittle without any discernable cleavage. The mean micro-indentation hardness is 295 kg/mm 2 , corresponding to a Mohs hardness of 4. In reflected light, it is grayish white; the bireflectance is weak, and the anisotropy is moderate in air and strong in oil. Internal reflections are absent. The reflectance data (air) are: 42.1, 48.5 at 470 nm, 41.0, 46.9 at 546 nm, 40.2, 45.8 at 589 nm and 39.6, 45.0% at 650 nm. The average results of five electron-microprobe analyses are: Cu 7.66(1), Ag 4.01(3), Pb 9.45(3), Bi 60.02(9), Se 0.30(1), Te 0.76(3), S 17.55(2), total 99.75(7) wt.%, corresponding to Cu 7.79 Ag 2.4 Pb 2.95 Bi 18.55 (Se 0.24 Te 0.39 S 35.37 ) ∑36 , calculated on the basis of ∑(S + Se + Te) = 36 atoms per formula unit. The simplified formula, Cu 8 Pb 4 Ag 2 Bi 18 S 36 , is in accordance with the empirical formula and that deduced from the crystal-structure analysis. The density, 6.78 g/cm 3 , was calculated using the ideal (structural) formula and Z = 1. Cupromakovickyite has a monoclinic cell with a 13.405(8), b 4.016(3), c 29.949(19) A, β 99.989(16)°, V 1587.8(17) A 3 , space group C 2/ m , and Z = 1. The strongest lines in the calculated powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A(I)( hkl )] are: 3.478(100)(114), 2.842(94)(312), 3.646(57)(206), 3.486(41)(208), 3.345(33)(402), 2.964(33)(310), 2.282(31)(1110). Its c dimension is double the length of the c dimension of makovickyite, the N = 4 member of the pavonite homologous series. Cupromakovickyite is closely structurally related to makovickyite. The name of the new mineral expresses this relationship. Both the mineral and its name were approved by the Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names (IMA 2002–58).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207