Adaptive octree‐based finite element analysis of two‐ and three‐dimensional indentation problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, much has been done to develop numerical tools to study the three‐dimensional nature of the Earth's lithosphere deformation. DOUAR is one of them: it is a new ALE Finite Element code that is based on an adaptive grid, a key feature in the capture of localized deformation. In order to illustrate this, various simulations of punch experiments have been performed on rigid plastic materials with von Mises and Drucker‐Prager type of rheologies. We present the grid refinement algorithm based on strain rate measurements and rederive the plane strain punch analytical solution which allows us to test the accuracy of our results. Various 3‐D strip punches experiments with different aspect ratios show DOUAR's ability to capture complex fault patterns. We also discuss the degree to which the incompressibility and rigid plasticity constraints are satisfied. Finally, we show the results of a crustal‐scale deformation experiment demonstrating the potential of the octree‐based mesh refinement algorithm to solve complex three‐dimensional geodynamical problems with great efficiency and accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it