Nucleophilic displacement on 4-nitrophenyl dimethyl phosphinate by ethoxide ion: alkali metal ion catalysis and mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on a spectrophotometric kinetic study of the effect of Li(+) and K(+) cations on the ethanolysis of 4-nitrophenyl dimethylphosphinate () in ethanol at 25 [degree]C. The nucleophilic displacement reaction of with LiOEt and KOEt in the absence and presence of 18-crown-6 ether (18-C-6) furnished observed first-order rate constants which increase in the order EtO(-) < KOEt < LiOEt. The kinetic data are analyzed in terms of a scheme which assigns concurrent kinetic activity to free ethoxide and metal alkoxide, to obtain the second-order rate coefficients for reaction of the metal ion-ethoxide pairs, k(MOEt). Derived [small delta]G(ip), [small delta]G(ts) and [capital Delta]G(cat) values quantify ground state and transition state stabilization by the metal ions to give [small delta]G(ts) > [small delta]G(ip) for Li(+) and [small delta]G(ts)[similar][small delta]G(ip) for K(+). These results indicate moderate catalysis by Li(+), with manifesting lesser susceptibility to catalysis than other substrates previously studied. Second-order rate constants for the reaction of the aryl dimethylphosphinates with free EtO(-) were obtained from plots of log k(obs)vs. [KOEt], measured in the presence of excess 18-C-6. Hammett plots with [sigma] and [sigma][degree] substituent constants give significantly better correlation of rates than [sigma](-) and yield a moderately large [small rho]([small rho][degree]) value; this is interpreted in terms of a stepwise mechanism involving rate-limiting formation of a pentacoordinate intermediate. Comparison of the present results with those of Williams on the aqueous alkaline hydrolysis of Me(2)P(O)-OPhX and Ph(2)P(O)-OPhX esters, establishes the rationale for a change in mechanism in the more basic EtO(-)/EtOH nucleophile/solvent system by a stepwise mechanism instead of a concerted one in aqueous base. Structure-reactivity correlations following Jencks show that the change in mechanism is accounted for by cross interactions between the nucleophile and the leaving group in the transition state. The observed duality of mechanism is rationalized on the basis of the More O'Ferrall-Jencks diagram, as a spectrum of transition states covering a wide range of nucleophile and leaving group basicities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".