MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030315299 · doi:10.7202/1014651ar

Une œuvre et son titre : à propos du Carnaval, op. 9, de Robert Schumann

2013· article· fr· W2030315299 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pierre Vachon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian University Music Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBach Studies and Logistics Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qu’y a-t-il dans le titre d’une œuvre musicale qui permettrait de mieux comprendre l’œuvre elle-même, sa genèse, sa construction, sa signification et le symbolisme dont elle pourrait se réclamer? Au-delà d’une constellation de fragments, le Carnaval, op. 9, de Robert Schumann porte en lui une logique motivique et symbolique que l’étude du titre permet de démasquer. L’auteur tente de montrer qu’une étude titrologique mettra au jour les liens très intimes entre musical et extramusical ainsi que le réseau de référents très complexe vers lequel le titre dirige. Le titre agit bien souvent comme interface entre l’œuvre musicale et son symbolisme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.030
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian University Music ReviewSame topicBach Studies and Logistics DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207