MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030340266 · doi:10.1002/dc.20518

Uterine adenosarcoma detected by Papanicolaou smear: A Case report

2006· article· en· W2030340266 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvia Pasternak, Rebecca F. MacIntosh

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostic Cytopathology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePapanicolaou stainDifferential diagnosisPathologyNucleolusBloodyStromaUterine cervixGynecologyImmunohistochemistryCarcinomaCancerCervical cancerSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adenosarcoma is a rare uterine biphasic tumor composed of benign epithelial elements and a sarcomatous stroma. Although it is well described histologically, its cytological features are rarely mentioned in the literature. We describe a case of uterine adenosarcoma that was first detected by Papanicolau (Pap) smear. Numerous crowded clusters of spindle cells were present within a bloody background, as well as a few smaller, dyscohesive groups with cells showing high N:C ratio and oval to round nuclei with coarse chromatin and small nucleoli. A few nuclear grooves were identified. Adenosarcomas are rare lesions but should be considered in the differential diagnosis when spindled cells are noted in a pap smear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnostic CytopathologySame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207