MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030366122 · doi:10.1063/1.4773235

Scanning photocurrent and photoluminescence imaging of a frozen polymer p-n junction

2012· article· en· W2030366122 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Inayeh, Bryce A. Dorin, Jun Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescencePhotocurrentMaterials scienceDopingLuminescenceOptoelectronicsPhotoconductivityPolymerElectrodeElectrochemical cellOpticsElectrochemistryChemistryPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A polymer light-emitting electrochemical cell (LEC) is a solid-state polymer device operating on in situ electrochemical doping and the formation of a light-emitting polymer p-n junction. Electrochemical doping of the luminescence polymer quenches the photoluminescence. The chemical potential difference between the p- and n-doped regions creates a built-in potential/field in the junction region, which can be probed by measuring the optical beam induced current (OBIC). In this study, the OBIC and photoluminescence profiles of the LEC have been simultaneously measured by scanning a focused light beam across a large planar LEC that has been turned on and cooled to freeze the doping profile. The photoluminescence intensity undergoes a sharp transition between the p- and n-doped regions. The OBIC photocurrent is only observed in the transition region that is narrower than the width of the excitation beam, which is about 35 μm. The results depict a static planar polymer p-n junction with a built-in field pointing from n to p. The electrode interface and the neutral regions do not produce a measurable photocurrent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207