MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030367715 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2014.7050087

Side information generation using optical flow and block matching in Wyner-Ziv video coding

2014· article· en· W2030367715 on OpenAlexaff
Yaser Mohammad Taheri, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMotion interpolationResidual frameOptical flowAlgorithmCoding (social sciences)CodecMotion estimationReference frameMotion compensationImage warpingDecoding methodsBlock-matching algorithmComputer visionMathematicsFrame (networking)Video processingVideo trackingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a new algorithm to generate high quality side information in Wyner-Ziv video coding is proposed. A block-matching algorithm is incorporated into the forward and backward optical flow and warping algorithms to find the forward and backward motion fields that are used for frame interpolation. Also, a symmetric optical flow algorithm for the purpose of frame interpolation is obtained by parameter modification in the energy functional of an optical flow algorithm. The average of the interpolated frames estimated using the forward/backward motion fields and symmetric flow is used to provide a high quality side information frame for decoding of the corresponding Wyner-Ziv frame in the Wyner-Ziv video coding problem. The proposed algorithm significantly improves the quality of the side information frames compared with those provided by the advanced block matching frame interpolation in the typical Wyner-Ziv video codecs. Simulation results showing significant improvements in side information quality and rate-distortion performance in Wyner-Ziv video coding are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207