MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030377445 · doi:10.1109/apec.2013.6520337

A fast nonlinear control technique for a grid-connected voltage source inverter with LCL filter used in renewable energy power conditioning systems

2013· article· en· W2030377445 on OpenAlexaff
Suzan Eren, Alireza Bakhshai, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Lyapunov functionComputer scienceVoltage sourceBandwidth (computing)InverterGridVoltageNonlinear systemEngineeringMathematicsControl (management)TelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new controller scheme for a grid-connected voltage source inverter with an LCL filter based on the Control Lyapunov Function (CLF). Conventional Proportional Resonant (PR) controllers are not able to provide a fast transient response due to their limited bandwidth. Therefore, they have difficulties handling severe load transients. Additionally, they can only reject the disturbance created by the grid voltage to some extent. The proposed CLF-based controller is able to increase the bandwidth of the closed loop control system, while providing guaranteed stability and perfect disturbance rejection. Since the proposed controller is based on the system model, it is able to completely remove the disturbances caused by the grid voltage. The integral terms of the error are also incorporated into the Lyapunov function in order to account for parameter uncertainties in the system model. The performance of the proposed control scheme has been compared to the PR controller through experimental results. The experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed control scheme over the conventional PR controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207